Film Trailers

Trailer Reaction: I’m Still Struggling to Take The Fantastic Four Seriously

There’s a new Fantastic Four trailer. We should probably talk about it, right?

Well, there wasn’t supposed to be a new trailer, but then it leaked because the studios aren’t very good at sopping those kinds of things from happening [see: Batman v Superman, Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One]. Now, it’s here. It sets up the basic plot, showcases everyone using their superpowers, and gives us our first glimpse at Doctor Doom.

Does it all seem a little familiar? If so, that’s probably because there was already a Fantastic Four movie ten years ago (and a sequel eight years ago), and although this new version has an African-American Johnny Storm and better special effects it does not appear dramatically different, right down to re-using Doctor Doom as their first villain and setting him up as a bad guy out for revenge (apparently).  As Forbes argued, “This Fantastic Four trailer sells a film that is not so much an original or different interpretation of the Stan Lee/Jack Kirby comic book, but rather like someone took the 2005 Tim Story origin story film and hit buttons marked ‘younger,’ ‘darker,’ ‘gritter,’ and ‘more real-world.'”

I have no sentimental attachment to the Fantastic Four characters through comic books or cartoons. The first two live-action films aren’t without some entertainment value, more so the first one than the sequel.  However, they were mostly miscast, looked relatively cheap, and have aged quite horribly.  That would seemingly make them ideal candidates for a more mature reboot, but what grand story is there really to be told about a family of superheroes and their best bud who gain kind of goofy powers through exposure to cosmic rays from outer space.  Even if you take it deadly serious, drop all of the characters ages by around a decade, change up the family dynamic by making Sue and Johnny an adopted, mixed-race brother and sister pair (or possibly not related at all), and alter the origin of their powers (from another dimension) you are still stuck with four characters whose powers do not translate as easily to the screen as others.

Yes, the Fantastic Four are a historically important comic book team, and the original films did not capture the darkness and cultural relevance present in the Fantastic Four’s early comic book days (or so I’m told by Fantastic Four fans). Director Josh Trank (Chronicle), writer/producer Simon Kinberg (X-Men: Days of Future Past, Star Wars: Rebels) and Fox are apparently working hard to honor that with their new cinematic iteration of the group, which stars Miles Teller as Reed Richards, Kate Mara as Sue Storm, Michael B. Jordan as Johnny Storm, Jamie Bell as The Thing and Toby Kebbell as Doctor Doom.

Fantastic-Four-2015-Movie-poster
Is anyone else getting an X-Men 1 vibe from their more practical, less colorful outfits?

There is precedent for a comic book film franchise moving from regrettable camp (Batman & Robin, the 1990 Captain America) to badass feats of serious filmmaking (Batman Begins) or at least surprising and pleasant competence (Captain America: The First Avenger).  Josh Trank (Chronicle) clearly has big plans for legitimizing the Fantastic Four as worthy film characters.  However, regardless of tonal shifts and advances in technology won’t someone like Reed “Mister Fantastic” Richards and his patented stretching ability always look kind of goofy?  Is he perhaps best either left as a cartoon character, or in more light-hearted material like the original Fantastic Four films to be enjoyed by less discriminating younger audiences?  I find myself skeptical that a super serious approach will ever truly work for Fantastic Four, although it was pretty much their only option after where they went with it in the earlier live-action films.  I am at least encouraged that the new trailer has a couple of jokes.

Back when the first trailer arrived, I took a deep dive into the film’s reportedly troubled production history, which mostly amounts to one source saying, “OMG, it’s a trainwreck!” and another saying, “Um, no it’s not!” I applauded them for delivering a trailer which actually intrigued, leaning toward sci-fi where the original films leaned fantasy and suggesting body horror imagery in those places where the original films prioritized light-hearted, family friendly entertainment. However, I expressed serious doubts about the likelihood of the actual source material translating to anything particularly worthwhile. Now that the second trailer is here, I find myself leaning more toward indifference.  Everyone’s powers look better than their earlier cinematic counterparts, and I like the suggestion that there will be a literally painful period of adjustment as they adapt to their powers.  This doesn’t look bad; it just looks a tad generic, a conclusion I admittedly might only reach because I’ve now seen one too many Christopher Nolan-esque trailers.

What about you?  What do you think?  Did this trailer really do it for you in the way the first one did not?  Or vice versa?  Do you wonder if I maybe watched a different trailer than you because how else could I so clearly have missed the brilliance Josh Trank is delivering?  Let me know in the comments.

The Fantastic Four opens August 7th thus allowing it time for a big promotional push at this year’s San Diego Comic-Con mere weeks before the release date.

8 comments

  1. I don’t like what I hear about their version of Dr Doom. I don’t like the cast because I think it looks way too young. Richard Reed without white hair strands is just weird and Sue is for me a more motherly figure. And this trailer poked at another pet peeve of mine: I hate it when female scientists are working with their daddy. It’s an overused trope which for me carries some unfortunate implications.

    1. I am not really tied to the traditional versions of the characters since I’ve never really been a fan, but I did immediately laugh in recognition and maybe agreement at your “Richard Reed without white hair strands is just weird.”

      Sue working for her dad seems like a narrative convenience, a way of solving the problem they likely presented to themselves in finding a way to justify her presence there and upping the personal stakes for her as well as the person in charge of the project (and maybe putting a chip on her shoulder, the “Prove I’m here because I deserve to be, not just because of nepotism” thing). I can adjust to her being younger and possibly not nearly as maternal a presence, but now that you’ve pointed it out making her a female scientist apparently working on a project with her daddy is pretty annoying, with implications they may not have considered.

      1. I am not opposed on some upgrades. I would, for example, have been totally behind Sue being there because she is a competent scientist in her own right, perhaps one who is frustrated because her work gets constantly overlooked instead of making her painfully shy. If her desire would be to be seen, her becoming the invisible woman would be quite ironic. They could also created a backstory in which she practically raised her brother herself. And they could have made her black too…I am not against a change in race, but I hate that they picked different ones for both actors. It would be great if he had a chip on his shoulder because he feels that he is only part of the project because of his sister. Who, in my mind, would be already old enough to be a full-fledged scientist, just like Reed.

        To their credit, I don’t think that the trope with the female scientist working for her daddy (and man, isn’t that another interstellar parallel?) has been discussed enough that they would have seen the issue with it.

  2. Seriously hoping really hard that this will be a good film. Fox better not have screwed it up! Unless, by screwing it up, the rights go back to Marvel, and we can have the Fantastic Four in the MCU. I’d be fine with that. More than fine, actually.

    1. I don’t think it looks like a bad film, just a tad generic. And since I have no real emotional connection to the franchise and its characters I am not quite mustering up much enthusiasm. Josh Trank’s Chronicle was a good movie, and Simon Kinberg made the scripts for both First Class and Days of Future Past work far better than I expected. So, this film does at least have that going for it. As for the rights, there is the ugliness over Marvel canceling the Fantastic Four comic book, but claiming it’s not because they don’t want to give free advertizing to the Fox film but due to poor sales and general disinterest. So, that’s something that’s happened.

      1. I have a small amount of nostalgia for the Fantastic Four. I vaguely remember the 90’s cartoon. I also went to Rise of the Silver Surfer in theatres, and that’s my first vivid memory of going to the movies. The next theatre-going experience I remember after that was Spider-Man 3. Yeah, I saw a lot of terrible superhero movies in theatres, now that I think about it.

    1. It’s a bit weird that Miles Teller and Michael B. Jordan were in the bro comedy That Awkward Moment together, and now they’re partners in the Fantastic Four. It is a reminder that much as I admire Teller’s acting I don’t actually love all the movies he makes, like Awkward Moment or Divergent. Holy crap, though, he’s fantastic in Whiplash and The Spectacular now. So, overall, I do think his presence is one of the biggest things Fantastic Four has going for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: