When Burt Reynolds recently appeared on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, the starstruck host reflected on the actor’s iconic status and exclaimed it was such an honor to meet him because, well, “You’re Burt fucking Reynolds!”

Indeed. Reynolds was once the premiere icon of American masculinity, the rare film star who appealed to everyone, boy or girl, young or old. That was a long time ago, though. Now, he’s pushing 80 and out there promoting his new memoir But Enough About Me, more than happy to take one last victory tour. Just don’t get into too big of a rush to include Boogie Nights in any kind of supercut of his career highlights. That film may have netted him his one and only Academy Award nomination, but he’s always hated it.

Funny thing about that: so does the guy he played in the movie.

Let’s back up.

Boogie Nights, if you don’t know, tells the fictional story of Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg), a well endowed, hopelessly naive young busboy who runs away from his emotionally abusive mother and straight into the outstretched arms of Jack Horner (Reynolds), a kindly old adult film director who is a bit of a Starmaker and helps rename Eddie “Dirk Diggler.” That’s just the kind of thing Horner does. He’s a Father Knows Best figure to all the wayward children and lost souls who drift toward porn only to later realize polite society will never take them back, and he’s right on the front lines when the porn industry transitions from the freewheeling, highminded 70s to the drugged out, commercialized 80s.

Reynolds objected to all of that. He disapproved of the subject matter. He didn’t understand his character, later disdainfully using the Father Knows Best comparison in his Golden Globes acceptance speech. He disliked the director (Paul Thomas Anderson, making his second movie) and even took a swing at him on set. He fired his agents for putting him in such trash. Even when the film turned into an awards contender, his half-hearted campaigning arguably torpedoed any chance he had of winning the Best Supporting Actor Oscar.

It’s now nearly 20 years later, yet Reynolds’ stance on Boogie Nights hasn’t softened. Talking to The Guardian, he admitted he “hates” it even though he’s never actually seen it. He’ll never work with Anderson again, who apparently offered him a role in Magnolia despite all the tension on the Boogie Nights set. In a separate interview with GQ, Reynolds further elaborated on the generational divide which was clearly at the heart of his feud with Anderson:

“I think mostly because he was young and full of himself. Every shot we did, it was like the first time [that shot had ever been done]. I remember the first shot we did in Boogie Nights, where I drive the car to Grauman’s Theater. After he said, ‘Isn’t that amazing?’ And I named five pictures that had the same kind of shot. It wasn’t original. But if you have to steal, steal from the best.”

What stealing from the best, Scorsese’s Goodfellas, in this case, looks like:

In real life, the adult film industry of the late 70s and early 80s had several Jack Horners. His physical appearance and fashion sense, for example, seem to be lifted from Deep Throat director Gerard Damiano, if not several others. However, since Boogie Nights is more or less an unofficial John Holmes biopic Horner’s experiences with Diggler most closely corresponds to Bob Chinn’s experiences with Holmes.

Just like their fictional counterparts, Holmes and Chinn made a series of hardcore private detective movies (in which Holmes always played Johnny Wadd, which is actually referenced in Boogie Nights) but had to abruptly cut off their partnership when Holmes’ drug abuse got out of control.

John Holmes and Bob Chinn, the real Dirk Diggler and Jack Horner

So, what did Chinn think of Boogie NightsThe Rialto Report asked him that a little over two years ago:

I knew nothing about the film [prior to its release], and was surprised when my ex-wife took me to see it.  I was even more surprised by the obvious parallels between myself and the Burt Reynolds character […] They say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but the way it parodied what I had done, when [Anderson] recreated those scenes from my films, making me out to be some kind of incompetent, rank amateur, was somewhat of an insult.

He’s not wrong. Boogie Nights pretty consistently portrays Horner and his crew as rank amateurs who don’t actually realize how amateurish they are.

The recreations he referenced come in the section of the film where Julianne Moore’s character shows Dirk the documentary she’s made about him. Much of this is lifted shot-for-shot from the actual documentary Exhausted: John C. Holmes, the Real Story, right down to the clips from two different Bob Chinn-directed Johnny Wadd movies. Dirk and Jack sitting in the editing room and disagreeing over exactly who’s really in charge is lifted from John Holmes and Bob Chinn having that same exchange in Exhausted.

cZ5jzow

Holmes had long since been dead by the time Boogie Nights came out (AIDS finally got him in ’88), but Chinn was still working in the industry at the time. In fact, the success of Boogie Nights and resulting resurgent interest in all things Holmes led Chinn to make a series of new Johnny Wadd movies with a different star. However, Chinn was never approached to act as a consultant on Boogie Nights (that job fell to Ron Jeremy) and was never told about Anderson’s shot-for-shot recreations.

So, he wasn’t exactly quick to forgive Boogie Nights’ various oversimplifications:

Sadly, it’s a totally inaccurate depiction. Some of the fictitious characters he came up with make the industry seem much worse than it actually was.  I like to believe that most of us were serious and professional, even though most of us were working on it with such low-budgets the results may appear to be amateur and threadbare, but at least we had spirit and imagination. The characters in Boogie Nights were all about money, and while we were about money it was not the main thing I thought. I think the way the industry is shown in Boogie Nights is more like it was when the video revolution took hold in the 1980s, and any backyard amateur with a camera could become a director and virtually anyone could start up a video distribution company.  These were the people who were interested in the money.

The irony here is everything he just said sounds a lot like Jack Horner, thinking back to his famous mid-movie speech, “Wait a minute. You come into my house, my party, to tell me about the future? That the future is tape, videotape, and not film? That it’s amateurs and not professionals? I’m a filmmaker, which is why I will *never* make a movie on tape.”

Maybe Burt Reynolds is too close to all of this to be able to appreciate his work in Anderon’s movie. The same might go for Bob Chinn. Still, even though they hate it, Boogie Nights has gone down as a classic, ranking as the 8th best film of all time if you ask Time Out and the various actors they surveyed to make their list.

Sources: Rialto ReportThe GuardianGQ

Advertisements

Posted by Kelly Konda

Grew up obsessing over movies and TV shows. Worked in a video store. Minored in film at college because my college didn't offer a film major. Worked in academia for a while. Have been freelance writing and running this blog since 2013.

3 Comments

  1. […] Burt Reynolds hates “Boogie Nights”, which earned him his only Academy Award nomination, despite having never watched it.. Ref: weminoredinfilm.com/2015/12/04/burt-reynolds-hates-boogie-nights-but-so-does-the-guy-he-played-in-th… […]

    Reply

  2. […] Then, later in the decade, there was the post-bankruptcy, anything goes Burt debasing himself as a horndog southern Senator in Demi Moore’s Striptease and vying for respectability in Paul Thomas Anderson’s masterful Boogie Nights, which netted him an Oscar nomination. Too bad he hated the film, but I’ve already written all about that. […]

    Reply

  3. Wow, this is a great piece! Great job you linked to it in your Burt Reynolds retrospective, or I never would’ve read it. Any other pieces of yours from the past that you felt got overlooked due to limited exposure? I’d love to read them!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.