Special Features

Deadpool 2’s Marketing Might Be More Interesting Than the Actual Movie

Deadpool 2 spoilers below. 

Deadpool isn’t real. He’s just an early 90s Rob Liefeld fever dream with an intentional Spider-Man knockoff costume who has since become Ryan Reynolds’ personal mascot and career-saver.

We all know that, just as we know Chris Evans isn’t really Captain America and Henry Cavill can’t fly. But, with Deadpool it’s been surprisingly easy to forget. Reynolds and 20th Century Fox’s marketing department – incidentally, those same people all set to be fired once Disney takes over – have taken Deadpool’s fourth-wall-breaking, Bugs Bunny persona from the comics and applied it to all manner of media. Print advertising, film trailers, TV commercials, music videos, talk show appearances, YouTube, Twitter, Wal Mart Blu-Ray displays, even Tinder – it doesn’t matter. Wherever we turn, Deadpool’s self-aware face is staring at us – well, his mask is staring at us, but his face is presumably flashing a shit-eating grin underneath – and deconstructing the very idea of film advertising.

He’s the ghost in the perpetual hype machine, and part of that hype has meant all of us playing along with the idea of Deadpool being real and not entirely fictional. That’s okay. We’ve been doing that for years now, like when Honest Trailers played along and allowed “Deadpool” to crash the following video:

So, it’s only naturally for Stephen Colbert to let “Deadpool” take over a recent Late Show monologue and lob some Trump jokes:

Imagine the disappointment, then, when Deadpool 2 finally arrived and turned out to just be a movie (check out Julianne’s spoiler-free review). Sure, it’s an undeniably funny movie with a thin plot, questionable treatment of female characters, inspired action scenes, pop culture and meta jokes galore, and one of the greatest post-credits scenes ever, but it’s still just a movie. The superhero deconstruction on display in the actual film is nothing compared to the months if not years of Deadpool 2’s deconstruction of superhero film advertising.

That presents a bit of quandary: Is it possible Deadpool 2’s advertising is actually funnier than the film itself? In the advertising, Reynolds has been freed from the constraints of plot, emotion, or any discernible character arc – ya know, all of those pesky little things an actual movie has to bother with. That means he spent a good chunk of one of the trailers playing with action figures like the overgrown child he is and hanging a lantern on the fact Josh Brolin’s metal arm in the film is entirely CGI meaning the actor simply wore a neon green sleeve over that arm on set.

By comparison, when that same specific scene of Cable displaying his metal arm while grenading his way through a prison happens in the movie it plays out in super intense, action-heavy fashion. Deadpool, of course, cracks a couple of jokes, most notably his hilarious “Aw, you’re so dark. Are you sure you’re not from the DC Universe?” quip, but the film has to play things fairly straight considering the importance of the sequence to the overall plot. Deadpool and Cable meet and fight for the first time and Deadpool learns Cable is after Russell, not him. Russell overhears Deadpool say he doesn’t care about him, thus setting him to go join Juggernaut.

Blah, blah, blah…super important plot stuff. So, no, the movie can’t just stop to let Deadpool play with toys or elaborately point out the artifice of it all. There are plot demands to be met, emotions to be paid off. That teaser, on the other hand, mocks the very idea of plot, in more ways than most people realize. You’ve probably seen the teaser before, but did you ever read the fake plot description Fox provided with it on YouTube? Because this part’s truly inspired:

“After surviving a near fatal bovine attack, a disfigured cafeteria chef (Wade Wilson) struggles to fulfill his dream of becoming Mayberry’s hottest bartender while also learning to cope with his lost sense of taste. Searching to regain his spice for life, as well as a flux capacitor, Wade must battle ninjas, the yakuza, and a pack of sexually aggressive canines, as he journeys around the world to discover the importance of family, friendship, and flavor – finding a new taste for adventure and earning the coveted coffee mug title of World’s Best Lover.”

Deadpool, the film character, is a more fleshed out person with a broken heart to mend and impossibly immature impulses to satisfy. Deadpool, the self-aware franchise mascot, is just pure impulse and punchline. He gets to crash a rather serious Celine Dion music video and dance about in mock-sadness before admonishing her for bringing far too much heart. “You’re at an 11. This is Deadpool 2, not Titanic. We need to get you down to a 5, 5.5 tops. Just phone it in,” he hilariously commands.

Deadpool, the mascot, gets to spend film teasers dressed as Bob Ross getting high on paint fumes…

Or epically failing his Christopher Reeve Superman impression…

He can flat-out mock a rather insane-sounding, but very real product tie-in…

Make the cover of Good Housekeeping to be a “naughty little stocking stuffer” letting out his holiday cheer:

Just hang out with David Beckham:

Crash Hugh Jackman’s Happy Birthday message to his wife:

Or mock Marvel Studios’ reflective, self-serious Infinity War marketing:

Deadpool, the film character, has to mourn Vanessa, struggle to find his own makeshift family, and ultimately set-up an X-Force movie. Even with Deadpool 2 ingeniously killing off the first iteration of X-Force with astonishing swiftness, there’s simply nothing as rule-breaking in the film as there has been in the film’s advertising.

Reynolds and Fox have redefined what mass advertising campaigns should (or at least can, depending on the individual film in question) look like in 2018, especially considering our collectively improving awareness of all the old tricks the film studios like to use. As a direct result, the trailers I saw in front of Deadpool 2 last night included a recurring bit where a self-aware, Benedict Cumberbatch-voiced Grinch interrupted the space in-between each trailer to demand the theater just play the freakin’ movie already. Of course, that in and of itself was its own form of advertising since there’s a new Grinch movie due soon, but that ingenious tactic made The Grinch’s advertising people seem far more on their game than their competitors rolling out the tried-and-true traditional trailers.

Come November, though, The Grinch will just be a movie, same as Deadpool 2. However, these days Hollywood doesn’t want movies; it wants events. Deadpool 2’s marketing has been an event like no other in film history, to the point that it has been (and will likely continue to be) even more interesting than the film itself.

So, what do you say? What has been more fun to this point, all of the Deadpool 2 marketing or the actual movie? Let me know in the comments.

Source: For a rundown of some of the other Deadpool 2 marketing stunts, check out this list at The Verge


  1. It should be obvious to say that it’s easier to produce a few minutes of excellence than 1.5 hours of it.

    I loved Michael Bay… when he did the Meat Loaf video “I’d Do Anything for Love (but I Won’t Do That)”. However his long form still sucks.

    1. Michael Bay directed that? WTF! How did I not know that? I knew he directed music videos first, like so many others from that era, but not that specific music video. Good for him.

      Also, yes short form content is going to be easier to churn out than a full film, but it’s not just the brevity of the Deadpool 2 marketing that interests me. It’s also the widespread experimentation and form-breaking that the movie itself doesn’t quite have time to try.

      1. Wow. TIL he also directed the Divinyl’s biggest hit (they had more in our home country of Australia): http://www.indiewire.com/2013/04/the-best-commercials-music-videos-of-michael-bay-99069/

        I imagine it’s also easier to subcontract out a 3 minute short to a recent film school graduate at a low budget.
        Also, like a Ramones album (especially the latter period), there are going to be several dud sections of 2 minutes but overall, those are over very quickly and it’s usually onto a significant high.

      2. But, and maybe I didn’t spell this out enough in the piece, it’s not just the videos. It’s everything. It’s hilarious fake plot descriptions on YouTube. It’s fake, but insanely detailed Twitter accounts, like the one they made for “Peter.” It’s Rob Delaney in character as Peter crashing a fan event the entire cast attended in the UK and offering them honey because his Twitter account mentions his love for bees. It’s guest editing a magazine. It’s sponsoring an alcohol company and using that platform to mock Ryan Reynolds real life purchase of his own liquor company. It’s photoshopping Deadpool onto the cover of a bunch of other Fox movies And then selling those in stores. It’s releasing a self-deprecating 2 year anniversary Deadpool Blu-Ray with a very R rated activity book. And to do all of that and stay entirely on point and perfectly in Deadpool tone.

  2. Like you, I had this little fear that DP 2 wouldn’t be as memorable as that Bob Ross trailer (I heart that trailer), that it would wouldn’t feature anything as funny as Wade messing up with a brush. Then, I kind of forget about that when I saw the final trailer. And actually, I already forgot about all of this (while I’m trying to write about the movie) until I read this (IIRC, you wrote about it before). That is to say, I wasn’t really expecting something more “out there”; maybe because the MCU and Infinity War kind of set my mind to be more on the “literal” side of story telling. And that DP 2 final trailer made it look like it would be lots of fun, thin plot and hit-and-miss jokes notwithstanding. (After seeing the movie, coming from David Lietch, action-wise, it’s a bit disappointing.)

    Of course I haven’t read that much comics and didn’t really know how funny or meta Deadpool could be on the comics. But I was already a bit disappointed with the first Deadpool movie (and so probably lowered my expectations accordingly). I thought it could have gone full-blown meta, and I expected something like Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Like say, Deadpool couldn’t beat an unbeatable CGI character, and the only way for him to win is to murder the whole SFX team. Y’know, something like that. Or maybe just a bit. Like set props or lights falling from the sky, or mic boom caught on screen. I mean, the possibilities are limitless, not just fourth wall breaking though dialogues/narration.

  3. Just read this from somewhere (EW) and it seems to have some answers related to your post. This is a quote from Ryan Reynolds re: DP 3.

    “I don’t know that there would be a Deadpool 3. I really don’t. I feel like the character, in order for him to function properly within his own universe, you need to take everything away from him. I don’t think that you can keep doing that. I do see him as being a part of X-Force, obviously. I would love to see him in a team-up sort of thing, like a mano a mano or a great female character from the X-Men universe.”

    – Maybe he’s more into making a movie that’s crazier than Fox would allow. And launching X-Force is maybe more of Fox’s idea than his and the filmmakers’. Some rules were set by Fox, maybe? If you compare DP and DP2, DP 2 is a mess. Maybe Reynold’s heart is really in the promotional materials because he’s had more freedom, not much in the movie. (But still, a more serious, X-Force movie with DP (or less DP) on it would be much welcome.)

    “I just think if you’re going to do another Deadpool solo film, you’ve got to really, like, get that budget down to nothing and just swing for the fences, and break all kinds of weird barriers, and do stuff that no one else can do.”

    “Why do they all have to be big comicbook movies? It could be anything”, he proclaimed. “I do think that we could go to a lot of very unexpected places”.

    – This sounds like something I would definitely love to watch: a full length movie that’s like the DVD extras, teasers, trailers string together—probably, it would be more like a SNL skit or a Robot Chicken episode than an actual movie. But why not? I’d surely go see it.

  4. I had kind of the opposite reaction. I liked the marketing at first, but after a certain point it just felt really overdone and I was starting to worry that they were compensating for something. I was just so oversaturated with Deadpool 2 hype that my expectations started to drop and I wasn’t all that excited for it anymore when we got tickets. Luckily, they didn’t drop the ball and it turned out to be a genuinely great action-comedy. Now that I mention it, I think I went through pretty much the same cycle back when they were over-marketing the first one too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: